Oxfam Novib stands behind the people who stand up for equality. Together, we fight for a world where everyone has equal opportunities, regardless of gender, ethnicity or skin colour. A world where everyone feels safe; where income gaps are shrinking instead of growing, where climate change is tackled in a firmer and more honest way.
Equality is the common thread in our work and projects, both internally and externally. We recognise that our team of colleagues can become even more diverse, and that only with a diverse team can we gain a broad perspective on the world. Therefore, we want to encourage everyone who hesitates to apply, no matter the reason. Our aim is to create an environment where everyone not only feels welcome, but where diversity is embraced and celebrated. Let's strive together to build a team that offers a rich variety of perspectives, enabling us to achieve an inclusive and inspiring work environment.
Background
The need for clear understanding of the effectiveness and relevance of capacity strengthening efforts within the FAIR for ALL program has prompted this research. Assessing these efforts is crucial to ensure they align with the needs of partner Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and contribute effectively to capacity strengthening.
FAIR for ALLโs Theory of Change (ToC) focuses on strengthening civil society capacities and womenโs voices to raise awareness and mobilise women, rural communities, farmers, workers and artisanal miners to influence and engage with public- and private-sector actors, build coalitions, support movements and create spaces to deliver change.
To achieve these goals FAIR for ALL takes a mutual capacity strengthening (MCS) approach, based on the notion that consortium partners and their networks bring valuable knowledge and skills to the table. FAIR for ALL brings together knowledge, skills and networks through processes of co-creation, complementation and joint learning supplemented by trainings, sharing tools, and providing financial resources (e.g. to involve external experts with new knowledge and skills).
FAIR for ALL expects capacity strengthening to increase the:
- Capacity to act โ increasing and demonstrating expertise and innovation, (digital) influencing capacity and ability to integrate cross-cutting issues (civic space, gender and conflict sensitivity), all contributing to strong local-to-global influencing networks.
- Capacity to connect โ working in partnerships, creating or strengthening strategic alliances and connecting to constituencies (grassroots women, farmers, workers, artisanal miners and youth) to increase legitimacy and impact.
- Capacity to operate โ on topics such as programme management, MEL, integrity, SEAH, finance and fundraising, which are all important for CSOsโ long-term organisational sustainability.
Rationale for the study
- To demonstrate the impact of capacity strengthening efforts to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other stakeholders.
- To enhance future program designs with effective capacity strengthening at their core.
- To ensure the optimal use of collective resources, including finance, time, and effort.
Objectives
- Collect evidence in support of the evaluation of the current capacity strengthening methods used by partners at all levels within the FAIR for ALL program.
- Match these methods with the needs of partner CSOs.
- Systematically assess capacity changes in current programs and recommend strategies for systematically assessing capacity changes in future programs.
- Provide advice to incorporate diverse, Indigenous, and decolonised approaches to capacity strengthening in current and future program design
Research questions
The research should have a focus on the following questions:
Primary Question:
- To what extent did the capacities of CSOs part of the FAIR for ALL program increased over the course and as a result of the program?
Sub-questions:
- Do the observed changes in CSOsโ capacities have an effect on the outcomes/impacts achieved by the programme?
- Does mutual capacity strengthening between partners also have an effect on the outcomes/impacts achieved by the programme?
- What are the capacity strengthening efforts in FAIR for ALL that are meeting partners' (including grassroot organisations) needs? What is working well? What challenges remain?
Additionally, would like the consultant to also touch upon the following secondary questions:
- What recommendations can we draw from research on diverse approaches to capacity strengthening, especially those rooted in indigenous, localised and decolonised knowledge? How can these integrate into current and future programs?
- What methodologies are being used internally within FAIR for ALL and externally among similar programs to reliably collect data on CSOsโ capacity strengthening? How can these external methodologies be adapted to a programme like FAIR for ALL?
- What can we learn from the other FAIR for ALL Consortium Partners on CSOs' capacity strengthening?
Methodology and deliverables
The consultant should propose an appropriate, participatory methodology to answer the Research Questions. The methodology is open to discussion with the team commissioning the research. The key deliverables expected from the study include:
- Short inception report with summary of workplan and methodology.
- A draft report, in editable format, including:
- Executive summary that can be used as standalone document.
- Explanation and justification for methodologies, including limitations.
- Documentation of findings (without identification of specific individuals) and general conclusions.
- Recommendations, including practical ways to implement new methodologies/actions into current and future projects.
- Appendices: Signed ToR and inception report; List of documents used; List of participants/interviewees and locations (if any) visited; Questionnaires or scripts for interviews or focus group discussions; Raw datasets (interview notes, data worksheets, etc.).
- (Online) Validation workshop, including summary of findings and participants.
- Presentation of findings (webinar).
- Final report in line with the above requirements, including handover of data collected.
This research is envisioned to be predominantly desk research in line with our ways of working remotely. However, this can be adjusted according to arising needs.
Data and tools available
- Capacity Assessment Tool (CATool) data
- Indicator data
- Outcome statements
- Reports from Mutual Capacity Strengthening Fund activities
- Annual plans and reports
- Baseline and Midterm report
- Research on MCS approach
- Additional resources as identified
Estimated time and budget allocation
The research should be completed by November 15, 2024. The budget allocated for this project inclusive of VAT is 20,000 euro. Cost will factor in the selection process.
Management arrangements
The research commissioning manager will be the first point of contact for the researcher(s) and ensure the researcher(s) have access to documents, people and other information needed. The commissioning manager will coordinate communication with FAIR for ALL stakeholders, such as the FAIR for ALL Capacity Strengthening Specialist and FAIR for ALL Program Manager and provide a quality check on the deliverables.