Strengthening Measurement: Developing a Social Inclusion Theory of Change, Indicators, and Measurement Guidance Consultancy

Tags: Law English Environment
  • Added Date: Wednesday, 24 December 2025
5 Steps to get a job in the United Nations

Description

Background:

Mercy Corps is a leading global organization powered by the belief that a better world is possible. In disaster, in hardship, in more than 40 countries around the world, we partner to put bold solutions into action โ€” helping people triumph over adversity and build stronger communities from within.

In 2023/2024, Mercy Corps developed results frameworks for four outcome areas in our Pathway to Possibility (P2P) - economic opportunities, food security, water security, and good governance. When these results frameworks were developed, social inclusion results were integrated into the results frameworks. However, the logical flow of social inclusion change pathways was not fully articulated in the outcome area results frameworks and are not detailed in other documents or resources. This results in a lack of consistent understanding of the causal pathways needed to, for example, shift gender norms to promote more equitable decision making to improve household nutrition. Additionally, in Mercy Corpsโ€™ 2025 Organizational Outcome Measurement (OOM) report, social inclusion themes were identified as a consistent gap in data collection, analysis, use and reporting.

Creating a theory of change and results framework with outcome areas around themes of shifting power, safety, wellbeing, and social behavior change will help unify some approaches, pathways and indicators across gender equality and social inclusion (GESI), adolescent and youth development, and protection technical areas. Creating a reference point will make it easier for program design teams to incorporate inclusion outcomes into their program theories of change more effectively, and to better measure the results.

Purpose / Project Description:

This project is aimed at strengthening social inclusion evidence, quality, accessibility, and use for program teams to achieve high impact programs reaching marginalized groups and prioritized participants. This builds our ability to be accountable to our organizational commitment of safety, diversity, and inclusion (SDI), which is present within our teams, operations, and programs. Currently, we are measuring social inclusion in our programs in a variety of ways, including through our program indicators, safeguarding standards, GESI minimum standards, organizational outcome dashboard, and participant reach data. However, we still face a data, analysis, and reflection deficit that inhibits our ability to fully understand how different participants benefit from program interventions in light of the challenges they face with safe, dignified access and meaningful participation. Without this information, we struggle to measure progress towards the aspirations of the SDI commitment.

Specific challenges this project will address:

Recommended for you